Sermon. St
Anselm’s Hayes, 29 July 2012
Trinity 8.
2 Kings 4.42-44
John 6.1-21
Some say the preacher
should always be relevant, and relevance at this time must mean a sermon full
of references to sport and the Olympics. I have to warn you that I am not one
such.
And so to the
gospel today. The multiplication of the loaves and the walking on water. What is
happening? I mean: How (if at all) do you picture it? What are we imagining? We
might say simply ‘miracles’. Okay, I agree. But what happened? Do we imagine
loaves of bread ‘extending themselves’, renewing themselves, once broken apart,
or whole loaves spontaneously appearing in the basket? Does it matter that we
cannot imagine quite the details of the miracle?
Some say – and
don’t dismiss this out of hand – that it happened like this. The boy with the
loaves and the fish was the one person who was willing to share the little food
he had. Once his offering was presented to the people, the rest were freed from
their fears and their selfishness. They were then willing to ‘admit’ that they
had food about them, and could of course (they now realise) share it with
others. The miracle was the miracle of generosity over fear. It’s not to be
dismissed, I think. I mean: surely that boy who ‘admitted’ that he had those
bits of food was being quite courageous in offering them. At the very least,
he’d have less food for himself. More: he might have been mobbed, and/or he
might have been ridiculed.
One thing we
cannot do is say that it does not matter what happened because the story is
unimportant, just a gloss, a detail, a triviality. No. That does not work. I
think we do have some sense that the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke are
similar in many ways, and/but John is very different. That is right. And indeed
I might ask: what is there which is in all four gospels? The story of the
passion, death and resurrection of the Lord. And… what else? Not much. The Christmas
story, let us remember, is found in Matthew and Luke but not Mark or John. But
certainly these two stories, of the multiplication of the loaves and the
walking on the water are dound in all four. What is more, like everything of
importance in the New Testament, it reflects a story in the Hebrew Bible, Old
Testament. We’ve heard that today as well. Elisha has confidence that twenty
loaves can feed a hundred people. And they can and there is, as in the gospels,
food left over.
I don’t know
what happened. You know that I don’t know what happened. I don’t know where the
emphasis should lie. Is it with the conviction that Jesus performed miracles?
That he gave us a whole new sense of what is possible? Is it with the miracle
of generosity and courage, when things look hard and narrow? Is it with the
continuity between the Testaments of the Bible, that the story of the people of
faith, whatever they call themselves, is one? I am tempted to say: yes, yes and
yes.
But, brothers
and sisters, I am going to say this as well: there is something that is
irritating or worse about this story, and about all other stories of miracles
in both Testaments and in the history of the Christian community. If God works
through miracles – loaves of bread extending themselves or spontaneously
appearing – then where is God for us? Our loaves of bread do not do
this. If we run out of bread, we have to buy or bake some more. If we cannot do
that, we go hungry. We cannot walk on water. If we try, we may drown. Each
story of a miracle that we hear is both a blessing – and encouragement – and
potentially a curse – a reminder that their story is not our story.
And I speak to
you on 29 July. If this 29 July were not a Sunday, it would be the Feast of
Mary, Martha and Lazarus. The Feast of Lazarus! The person whom Jesus –
according to the same gospel of John – raised from the dead! Miracles are in
the air, today, in the Church’s readings and mediations. But… where are they
for us? We might be asking: Are we less deserving of miracles? Are we too dull,
or too sinful, to receive them? Are our problems, which so mar our lives and
hold them back, really trivial, uninteresting to God? Or, is it even worse than
that: Are our problems sent to us by God?
Brothers and
sisters, I cannot believe that. I start from a different place. I start from
the conviction that we are made for each other. And we are made to need each
other. If we are to need each other, we must have some problems or issues which
others, with us, can solve or work with. We are meant to need our doctors and
nurses, and all the rest, and we are meant to need all those people who pray
for us. If healing always came in a miraculous instant, none of this would be
necessary. None of this would be possible. We are meant to need each other, and
there is this good and its way miraculous news: When we own that we need each
other, things happen. They shift, they move, they open up.
So, sisters and
brothers, I do believe in the possibility of miracles. I do not think we human
beings should try to ‘contain’ God, with our cynicism, be it philosophical or
emotional. I do want to treat the Bible stories as serious. When a story is
repeated, four times (that is: when it is in all four gospels), then I don’t
want to be the one who limits its meaning. But I do not stand before you today
as one who is in any sense promising more miracles in that style. I stand
before you today as someone who believes we are meant to need each other. God
means us to need each other.
In that spirit,
then, we offer today the liturgy of healing. You are free, if you want, in just
a moment, to come forward for prayer. This will involve the laying on of hands
and, if you further want this, anointing with the oil of healing. You can come forward
for prayer for yourself, or for another. You can just mention the name of the
other person when you are with me. It is offered, not because God works through
offering instant miraculous solutions to our problems. It is offered because
one way of our needing each other, can be for our asking for prayer. For
strengthening. For spiritual food, sustenance for the journey. And since the
anointing is itslf a sacrament, you are asking for the help of the whole
Church, mystically present with us, as at every sacrament. Don’t feel under any
pressure to come forward. Certainly, don’t do it to please me. But don’t stay
away because you are not sure you believe in miracles any way. I hope I’ve said
enough to make it clear it’s not about magical miracles as they might be
understood. It is about another way of letting God work with what is already
going on in your life.
Whatever
actually happened, the message of the multiplication of the loaves is that
Jesus feeds us. He nourishes us. He nourishes us, time and time again. He meets
us at the point of our need, and we are strengthened, and things are opened up,
and there is light for us. If we keep on, knowing that we are for each other
and that we are meant to need each other, we will be nourished by our Lord. We
may be more than strengthened. We may find there is a spring in our step. We
may even find ourselves drawn to be, ever so slightly, sporty. It’s a good time
for that sort of thing, I hear! Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment