Sermon. St Michael and All Angels, Little Ilford.
13.12.20
Advent 3: Gaudete
(Year B)
John 1.6-8, 19-28
Today’s Gospel is full of negatives and absences.
What a way to begin! I really don’t wish to lower the mood – the Gaudete mood. I know we all need comfort and hope, and
a reliable supply of both and more, in these days. And there are, of course,
good things in today’s Gospel. But, at a rather technical level, today’s
Gospel is full of negatives and absences.
Negatives.
Let’s recall John’s dialogue with those sent from
Jerusalem to Bethany, across the Jordan:
J: “I am not the
Messiah!”
O: “Are you Elijah?” J: “I
am not.”
O: “Are you the prophet?” J:
“No.”
This ever-more brutal exchange is consistent with
what the Evangelist has already told us:
“He was not the Light.”
We are being led to see who John the Baptist is not,
and thus already being nudged to think that there is one for whom all
these negatives will fall away.
And, on cue, the Baptist says as much:
“I baptise with water. Among you stands one
whom you do not know, the one who is coming after me. I am not worthy to untie
the thong of his sandal.”
I think this is carefully crafted. I think the
hearers of this tale are meant to feel intrigue, excitement. Who
is this one? This one we know not, but who is already among us?
Do we feel that excitement? I think it’s unlikely.
For most of us, we’ve heard – we’ve read – the story many times, from start to
finish. And let me add, that is fine. The Gospels were written to be heard, over
and over. If we are comfortable with the story, all is well.
Yet, where we cannot necessarily feel intrigue or
excitement, we may yet wonder - wonder if there isn’t here an
invitation to hear the story anew. We know the name of the one who is
already among us. His name is Jesus. We know him, know aspects of him. He
is no stranger. We need not pretend he is. And yet, do we know him as well as
we could? Is he not in many ways still strange to us? Might we as-it-were
start again: begin a new journey of getting to know
·
the one who changes everything, who is already
among us;
·
the one who is already among us, who changes
everything?
*
And so, from the negative to the absence. I
suspect you have already sensed that today’s Gospel reading is a real cut-and-paste-and-cut-and-paste
job. If you look at the chapter and verses, this is confirmed, What we have
are two separate excerpts taken out of the opening of John’s Gospel. And
we may well have at the back of our minds the texts in that opening which are
absent today. Here are some of them:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with
Gd, and the Word was Gd…
In [this one] was life, and the life was the light
of the world. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not
overcome it…
The Word became flesh and lived among us, and we
have seen his glory…”
That’s all rather different from the tale of
intrigue. This isn’t a story of people pointing to people. This is a grander-scale
narrative, a panorama, a view of everything, of all that this. The
themes are creation, and the nature of Gd. And it is not prose,
but poetry.
How then does it all fit together? Is it meant to?
Or did the writer, or some later scribe, make a mistake? I am confident that
they are meant to fit together. We hear of the origins of the universe and
the nature of Gd. But before we have any chance to fool ourselves we’ve
taken it seriously in, we change focus. And this too is carefully crafted. Intentionally,
we are led from the telescope to the microscope.
“There came a person, sent from Gd; John, his
name.”
What do we learn from this? I will put it slightly
challengingly: we learn that Gd does not care about humanity! I mean: Gd
does not care about “humanity” in the abstract. Gd cares only for human beings
in particular.
·
For you.
·
For me.
·
For the person next to you.
·
For the person impossibly distant from you, in all
possible ways.
·
For the ones you love.
·
And… for the ones you can’t stand.
We human beings cannot sustain that loving
attention for literally billions of people. But, then, we are not Gd. Gd is
Gd. And Gd does not care for “humanity”, but for human beings. From the absence,
we learn this.
“There came a person, sent from Gd, John, his
name.” And, being
sent from Gd, his presence makes all the difference. This one is the
very herald who says the Word-made-flesh is already among us,
sometimes known, sometimes (more often, perhaps) not known.
So, indeed, today is Gaudete
Sunday. Today
is a day of rejoicing, albeit it of gentle rejoicing. Today is our pink
(or, as we are perhaps learning to say, our “Rose” day). We are in the middle
of our Advent “fast” (how’s that going, brothers and sisters?)! Better put: we
are in the middle of our Advent reflections and preparations, leading up
to Christmas. And here we relax any restraint we’ve put ourselves under. We, in
a gentle and understated way, anticipate Christmas.
“There came a person, sent from Gd, John, his
name.” And, being
sent from Gd, his presence makes all the difference.
Sisters and brothers, I repeat a theme I have
brought before. And I make not the slightest apology for the repetition. (You
may chide me, but I will not budge.) What is said of John, can be said of
you. You may think of your name; I invite you to.
“There came a person, sent from Gd, their name was
[Name]. And, being sent from Gd, their presence makes all the difference.”
And, today, I am not even going to set you (to set
us) the task of thinking about all the ways we might be sent from Gd into the
world. There is of course a time for that. Of course, being sent from Gd implicates
us in a task. Yes, vocation is a task,
a burden even. Yes, further: hardship and risk and danger and
sacrifice are all involved. But! But, today (anticipating Christmas) I say:
even before and outside of that task, if we are in the world (and here
we are), we are sent from Gd. Our very being is sent-from-Gd.
“There came a person, sent from Gd, their name was
[Name]. And, being sent from Gd, their presence makes all the difference.”
Gaudete! Let us rejoice! Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment