Sunday, 3 July 2022

In Favour of Walking Away!

 

Sermon. 3 July 2022. Trinity 3 (Year C)

 

Isaiah 66.10-14

Luke 10.1-11; 16-20

 

Today’s Gospel is a success story. A twofold success story. The apostles - and there are at least 70 of them here – the apostles, exceptionally, get things right. And the apostles experience miracles through their own actions. The Gospel is proclaimed and embraced. People are healed, and freed from what possessed them, what held them back. Given this success, it makes perfect sense that the Gospel is wed to some beautiful words of prophetic hope from the very end of the Book of Isaiah:  “You shall see, and your heart shall rejoice; your bodies [atzemotekhem][1] shall flourish like the grass; and it shall be known that the hand of the LORD is with his servants…”

 

But today’s Gospel is not only a success story. What we may miss is that Jesus envisages that the apostles will meet with mixed responses. Sometimes they will be embraced. Sometimes they will be rebuffed. Jesus says: “But whenever you enter a town and they do not welcome you, go out into its streets and say: ‘Even the dust of your town that clings to our feet, we wipe off in protest against you. Yet know this: the kingdom of God has come near.'”

 

And, in case you were wondering what is in the verses that are missed out today – look again at the verse numbers – we skip from verse 11 to verse 16 – well, in those missing verses are “woes”. “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida!” and Capernaum too – because you did not welcome Jesus or the  apostles. So we miss Jesus saying that failure is not only a theoretical possibility. Failure has actually happened.

 

So we may as well say it: while the headline theme today is success, healing, obvious and visible blessing, a secondary theme is the presence, the reality of conflict. Conflict is part of the life of those living after the pattern of Jesus. They/we/you will face, at least at times, conflict and rejection.

 

What is a follower of Jesus called to do, when they meet someone who approaches them as an “enemy”? This we know. We all know this. We are called to love our enemies [Matt 5.44; Luke 6.27]. But the danger is that we may think this means we have to like our enemies. We have to be kind and warm to our enemies. We have to have fluffy thoughts about them, and seek to help them in the ways they ask for help.

 

And today we have evidence that that is wrong. It is not like that. We do not have to feel warm and cosy about those who oppose us. Sometimes we have to look them in the eye. and say: “You have rejected what I came to bring, and so now I am walking away. I am walking away from you.”

 

I am walking away from you. Doesn’t sound very Christian? Then we need to expand our imagination about what constitutes Christian behaviour. For this is, after all, a command from our Lord and Saviour. He gives us the gift of a symbolic act to go with the walking away. You are to brush the dust from your feet and say (I’ll give an over-literal translation): “The dust that has clung from your city into our feet we shake off, to you.” (There isn’t actually a word for “protest” in the Greek, but it clearly means something like that. It isn’t a pleasant thing to have dust shaken off “to you”.)

 

I say again: there is nothing un-Christian about this. Walking away is not the first Christian response, in the face of conflict. Walking away, we may hope and think, is to be a rare action. But it can be done. It can be the right thing to do. It is a version of what counsellors and other wise mentors tell us, tell us often: that we benefit when boundaries are clear. Where there is conflict, it can be your duty to set clear boundaries. To say: Thus far and no further. To say: No.

 

One thing I want to say is that you can take this command literally. If you need to walk away from someone or a situation, make real this symbolism. Enact it. Brush the dust off yourself. It can be a great marker of the necessary, the healing separation. Far better than smiling sweetly and harbouring hidden resentment. Far better than doing what the counsellors also say: letting your enemy live rent free in your head. Brush the dust.

 

Do I want to give examples of where we, as a Church, locally and nationally, need to be drawing clear boundaries, and brushing the dust off our feet?

 

I think I do not. There are and will be occasions when this is utterly necessary. (Be clear!) But that discussion is for another place. Here and now, what I most want to do is recommend the virtue of what the monastic tradition calls… apátheia.  

 

Apátheia. Am I commending apathy? No, absolutely not, at least not as the word is usually understood. The virtuous practice of apátheia means a right kind of detachment. You can be angry, and you can feel hurt. Both of these are part of life. But do not let the anger and the hurt possess you, become you, take over. Do not make it inevitable that you act out of anger or hurt. Keep some distance from them, even as you feel them. Have at your deepest core the peace of equanimity. Apátheia is that sort of thing!

 

And if I say that this virtue is not one that is valued in our society – at least, not in the way we debate things – then I am making an understatement. Our political debates run on anger. They run on name-calling. They run on saying: “’I’ll ignore your question because - look over here – the other lot are worse!” Time and time and time again. Running on anger. My sense, drawing in no small part on today’s Gospel, is that we will not come together to tackle any of the momentous crises we as a society and nation are facing, until we move away from our public, often ritualised venting of anger and hate, as if they were a real discussion, as if they were real deliberation, real exploration of resolutions. They are not. Our debates are substitutes for discussions.

 

So I sing the praise of apathy if understood as apátheia,

and I commend the practice, when the time is right (which may be rare),

of walking away and brushing the dust from your feet.

All these can be Christian things to do.

 

Amen.   



[1] In Biblical Hebrew, one does not “have” a body. Rather, one “is” a body. This is so obvious, that in fact there is no Biblical Hebrew word for a living body. The Hebrew here is literally “your bones”. Bones also take on the meaning of “your very self”, “your essence”.

No comments:

Post a Comment